AI Visibility Monthly Index
We monitor AI visibility for our own site, netsujo.jp, month by month, using a fixed 20 questions under identical conditions. Every figure shown is a real measurement; a metric we have not measured is left out rather than shown as zero.
Monthly trend
| Period | Runs | Brand mention rate | Official-site citation rate | Methodology |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07 | 40 (20 questions × 2 measurement days) | 0% (0/40) | 0% (0/40) | 2026-07-02.v1 |
Runs is the total answer count for "fixed 20 questions × number of measurement days" (40 for 2026-07). Accuracy rate, share of voice, and AI-referral sessions are not yet measured and are not shown. We do not compare figures across different methodology versions directly.
Run detail and observation notes
| Date | Engine | Mentioned | Official citation |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-07-02 | OpenAI Web Search (gpt-4o) | 0/20 | 0/20 |
| 2026-07-03 | OpenAI Web Search (gpt-4o) | 0/20 | 0/20 |
- 2026-07-02 — Initial baseline. Zero mentions and zero official citations across all 20 questions. We also found the AI misinterpreting "AIO" as a security term, recommending security firms for a company-recommendation question.
- 2026-07-03 — An early check the day after we published our AIO definition (llms.txt plus an explicit definition). Mentions and citations were still zero. The answer to "a company I can commission for AIO measures," which had listed security companies the day before, shifted toward our published definition (AI search optimization). We do not claim this change was caused by our own action.
Limitations of this observation
- Methodology v1 runs each question once, so a single month is affected by variance; we plan to increase run count in a future version.
- The engine currently measured is OpenAI Web Search only.
- AI answers vary run to run and over time; we do not casually assert causation between an observed change and a specific action.
- This observation does not guarantee search ranking, AI-answer inclusion, or citation.