Skip to main content
日本語

Real Estate RWA (Security Tokens) in Japan: Cases and Regulation

Tomohiro Iida · Published May 16, 2026

In one line: real estate RWA (security tokens) in Japan is taking shape mainly around leading platforms such as Progmat ST (from Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking) and ibet for Fin (BOOSTRY), built on schemes based in the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act. This article sets out the major deals, leading platforms, regulation, and adoption process at a level of detail useful for evaluating a real-world project.

Major real estate security token deals in Japan

Japan's domestic security token market had reached cumulative issuance of over JPY 355.2 billion across 84 deals as of early March 2026 (per Progmat). Here are three recent representative deals.

DealIssuerPlatformAmountDate
MUFG Realty Token: Osaka Dojimahama TowerCoast GK / Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking / Mitsubishi UFJ Real Estate Investment Advisors / Nomura Securities and othersProgmat STJPY 22.4 billionMarch 2026
KJRM Realty Token: Shiodome City CenterKJR Management / Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and BankingProgmat STJPY 31.4 billionSeptember 2025
Student Residence STMitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking / Daiwa Securities and othersProgmat STUndisclosedJanuary 2024

Comparing the leading platforms

The leading platforms differ in track record, participating financial institutions, and underlying blockchain. Here is a comparison of the two most prominent.

PlatformOperatorTrack recordBase layer
Progmat STProgmat, Inc.Cumulative JPY 231.4 billion across 45 deals (as of early March 2026, per Progmat)Built on Corda5; planned migration to Avalanche L1 around end of June 2026
ibet for FinBOOSTRY (backed by Nomura Holdings, NRI, SBI Holdings, and JPX)BOOSTRY forecasts Japan's public security token market reaching roughly JPY 530 billion by the end of fiscal 2026GoQuorum (an Ethereum-derived consortium blockchain)

Progmat ST is a leading domestic ST platform originating from Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking, with trust banks, securities firms, and asset managers participating; it holds the top share of the domestic ST market by cumulative issuance and deal count. ibet for Fin is run by a cross-industry consortium centered on financial institutions, with around 20 co-operating companies as of January 2025.

Comparing three regulatory schemes

Tokenizing real estate in Japan can follow three main schemes, each under different governing law. Which one applies depends on deal size and investor base.

SchemeGoverning lawRights coveredRequired license
Electronically recorded transferable rights (ST) schemeFinancial Instruments and Exchange Act (electronically recorded transferable securities-representing rights, etc.)Trusts issuing beneficiary certificates / collective investment scheme interests, etc.Type I Financial Instruments Business license
Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act schemeReal Estate Specified Joint Enterprise ActAnonymous partnership contributions / voluntary partnership interests, etc.Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise operator permit
Deemed securities schemeFinancial Instruments and Exchange Act (deemed securities)Collective investment scheme interestsType II Financial Instruments Business license

The 5-step adoption process

STEP 1: Select the target property and decide on a scheme
Decide between an ST scheme and a Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act scheme based on property type (office, residential, student residence, logistics facility, and so on), whether a trust structure is feasible, and the expected investor base. ST tends to suit large institutional-investor deals; the Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act scheme is more realistic for regional projects.
STEP 2: Structure the trust and design the beneficiary interest
Work with a trust bank to place the real estate into trust and issue a beneficiary interest. When tokenizing on a platform such as Progmat ST or ibet for Fin, define the division of roles among the trust bank, securities firm, registry administrator, and platform provider, and design the operational flow for holder management, transfer restrictions, distributions, and redemption.
STEP 3: Select a platform and issue the token
When using an existing platform such as Progmat ST or ibet for Fin, the issuer typically does not build a custom smart contract from scratch. Design the operational details — KYC, transfer restrictions, registry administration, distribution, redemption, and incident response — to match the existing platform's specifications.
STEP 4: Offer and sell
Work with a Type I Financial Instruments Business operator, typically a securities firm, to run a private or public offering. Disclosure documents and the eligible investor base differ across a professional private placement, a qualified institutional investor private placement, and a general public offering, so the approach needs to be settled early.
STEP 5: Secondary trading and operation
Secure a channel for secondary trading, whether through a proprietary trading system (PTS) or over-the-counter trades. Since 2025, the launch of platforms such as ODX (Osaka Digital Exchange) has expanded the options for secondary trading.

Real estate, government bonds, and receivables all fall under RWA, but the approach changes with the target asset and scheme. We can help from the earliest stage of shaping the business case and identifying the regulatory questions.

Talk to us about your RWA plans

Netsujo supports the early planning conversation — whether to use an ST scheme, which platform, and which trust bank or securities firm to work with — as an implementation-focused business development partner.

Read: RWA tokenization basics

Frequently asked questions

Which are the main platforms issuing real estate RWA (security tokens) in Japan?
The two representative platforms are Progmat ST (from Mitsubishi UFJ Trust and Banking) and ibet for Fin (BOOSTRY). Progmat ST holds the largest share of the domestic market by cumulative issuance and deal count; ibet for Fin operates as a consortium platform centered on financial institutions.
What's the difference between a real estate ST and a Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act scheme?
The governing law and required licenses differ. ST is based on the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, and issuing, offering, and selling assumes involvement from a financial instruments business operator or trust bank. The other scheme is based on the Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act, requiring a license as a real estate specified joint enterprise operator, and is sometimes used for small- to mid-size or regional deals.
Can individual investors buy a real estate ST?
A publicly offered ST can be bought by general individual investors. In the Osaka Dojimahama Tower deal, for example, Nomura Securities and Mitsubishi UFJ Morgan Stanley Securities acted as underwriters, with units issued at JPY 1 million each. Privately placed STs, by contrast, are limited to a defined investor base.
What's the minimum investment for a small-lot deal?
It depends on the deal. Public-offering STs have been seen with unit prices from around JPY 100,000 to JPY 1 million. Real estate crowdfunding under the Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act scheme sometimes allows smaller minimum investments.
What kind of returns can I expect from a real estate ST?
This varies by deal, property type, and holding period. The projected distribution yield needs to be checked in each deal's own disclosure documents — a blanket claim that domestic real estate STs uniformly yield a fixed annual percentage should be avoided. Liquidity, transfer restrictions, holding period, and early-redemption conditions should also be checked.
How does a real estate ST differ from a J-REIT?
A J-REIT is a highly liquid, listed instrument that trades daily on an exchange. A real estate ST is typically issued against a single property or a specific portfolio, which can give a more direct sense of exposure to the underlying asset, though secondary trading and transfer restrictions vary deal by deal. Compare on liquidity, minimum investment unit, and transparency of the underlying asset, not just yield.
Can a smaller real estate company enter this market?
The requirements around trust structuring, securities involvement, registry administration, and sales are demanding, so entering alone is difficult. Options include partnering with a trust bank, securities firm, or asset manager already connected to an existing platform, or starting with a Real Estate Specified Joint Enterprise Act scheme or real estate crowdfunding.
Does a real estate ST need a smart contract audit?
When using an existing platform such as Progmat ST or ibet for Fin, the premise is different from an issuer building a custom smart contract for each deal. That said, business, legal, and operational review is still needed — platform risk, holder management, KYC, transfer restrictions, offering terms, the trust agreement, and incident response.